Our Approach To Dangerous Organizations and Individuals
How we approach dangerous organizations and individuals.
Our approach to the opioid epidemic
How we support communities in the face of the opioid epidemic.
Our approach to elections
How we help prevent interference, empower people to vote and more.
Our approach to misinformation
How we work with independent fact-checkers, and more, to identify and take action on misinformation.
Our approach to newsworthy content
How we assess content for newsworthiness.
Our approach to Facebook Feed ranking
How we reduce problematic content in News Feed.
Our approach to explaining ranking
How we build AI systems.
Content Library and Content Library API
Comprehensive access to public data from Facebook and Instagram
Ad Library tools
Comprehensive and searchable database of all ads currently running across Meta technologies
Other research tools and datasets
Additional tools for in-depth research on Meta technologies and programs
Community Standards Enforcement Report
Quarterly report on how well we're doing at enforcing our policies on the Facebook app and Instagram.
Intellectual Property
Report on how well we're helping people protect their intellectual property.
Government Requests for User Data
Report on government request for people's data.
Content Restrictions Based on Local Law
Report on when we restrict content that's reported to us as violating local law.
Internet Disruptions
Report on intentional internet restrictions that limit people's ability to access the internet.
Widely Viewed Content Report
Quarterly report on what people see on Facebook, including the content that receives the widest distribution during the quarter.
Regulatory and Other Transparency Reports
Download current and past regulatory reports for Facebook and Instagram.
For policy violations, we measure the number of pieces of content (such as posts, photos, videos or comments) we restored after we originally took action on them.
By “restore,” we mean returning content that we previously removed or removing a cover from content that we previously covered with a warning.
We report content that we restored in response to appeals as well as content we restored that wasn’t directly appealed. We restore content without an appeal for a few reasons, including:
When we made a mistake in removing multiple posts of the same content. In this case, we only need one person to appeal our decision to restore all of the posts.
When we identify an error in our review and restore the content before the person who posted it appeals.
When we remove posts containing links we identify as malicious, and then learn the link isn't harmful anymore. In this case, we can restore the posts. This is particularly true with spam.
It might be tempting to read this metric as an indicator of the mistakes we make in taking action on content. However, as in the example of malicious links noted above, restoring a post doesn't necessarily mean a mistake was made.
We report the total amount of content that Meta restored in each quarter — for example, January 1 through March 31. Keep in mind that this means that the numbers can't be compared directly to content actioned or to appeals for the same quarter. For example, some restored content may have been appealed within the previous time period, and some content appealed may be restored in the next time period.
A piece of content can be any number of things including a post, photo, video or comment. How we count individual pieces of content can be complex and has evolved over time. Learn more about our content actioned metric.
How we measure appeals on accounts, Pages, Groups and Events
The Community Standards Enforcement Report does not currently include any metrics for accounts, pages, groups and events we restored.
