Facebook Community Standards
Policies that outline what is and isn't allowed on the Facebook app.
Instagram Community Guidelines
Policies that outline what is and isn't allowed on the Instagram app.
Meta Advertising Standards
Policies for ad content and business assets.
Other policies
Other policies that apply to Meta technologies.
How Meta improves
How we update our policies, measure results, work with others, and more.
Our approach to the opioid epidemic
How we support communities in the face of the opioid epidemic.
Our approach to elections
How we help prevent interference, empower people to vote and more.
Our approach to misinformation
How we work with independent fact-checkers, and more, to identify and take action on misinformation.
Our approach to newsworthy content
How we assess content for newsworthiness.
Our approach to Facebook Feed ranking
How we reduce problematic content in News Feed.
Our approach to explaining ranking
How we build AI systems.
Content Library and Content Library API
Comprehensive access to public data from Facebook and Instagram
Ad Library tools
Comprehensive and searchable database of all ads currently running across Meta technologies
Other research tools and datasets
Additional tools for in-depth research on Meta technologies and programs
Community Standards Enforcement Report
Quarterly report on how well we're doing at enforcing our policies on the Facebook app and Instagram.
Intellectual Property
Report on how well we're helping people protect their intellectual property.
Government Requests for User Data
Report on government request for people's data.
Content Restrictions Based on Local Law
Report on when we restrict content that's reported to us as violating local law.
Internet Disruptions
Report on intentional internet restrictions that limit people's ability to access the internet.
Widely Viewed Content Report
Quarterly report on what people see on Facebook, including the content that receives the widest distribution during the quarter.
Regulatory and Other Transparency Reports
Download current and past regulatory reports for Facebook and Instagram.
2024-028-IG-MR, 2024-029-TH-MR, 2024-030-FB-MR
Today, May 21, 2024, the Oversight Board selected a case bundle referred by Meta regarding three pieces of text content posted across Threads, Facebook, and Instagram. These posts make criminal allegations against groups on the basis of nationality, which we consider to be a protected characteristic under our Hate Speech policy.
Meta referred the case bundle to the Oversight Board after the issue of how to treat criminal comparisons on the basis of nationality emerged as one of the most challenging questions during an ongoing policy development process.
The first piece of content is a Thread posted as a reply that states, “Genocide….. all Israelis are criminals.” The second piece of content is a Facebook post that says “Americans” and “Russians” are “criminals.” The third piece of content is a comment on an Instagram post that says, “All Indians are rapist[s].”
Meta determined that all three pieces of content violated our Hate Speech policy, as laid out in theInstagram Community Guidelines and Facebook Community Standards. We therefore removed all three pieces of content.
Under our Hate Speech policy, we remove content that targets people based on their protected characteristics or immigration status with Hate Speech attacks in the form of dehumanizing speech that compares them to criminals. National origin and ethnicity are both protected characteristic groups. Moreover, in these three pieces of content, Hate Speech attacks were made against people of a given nation, not toward that nation itself.
Meta referred this case to the board because we found it significant and difficult as it creates tension between our values of safety and voice.
While we believe the lines our policies articulate around unqualified behavioral statements in the context of hate speech attacks are in the right place to cover most circumstances, we also recognize that there are situations – particularly in times of crisis and conflict – where criminal allegations directed towards people of a given nationality may be interpreted as attacking a nation’s policies, its government, or its military rather than its people.
While the submission does not constitute a request for a formal Policy Advisory Opinion, as a part of the case Meta submitted to the board two possible options which we have outlined for them to consider, or any other options they determine may be appropriate:
Option 1: create an escalation-only framework to differentiate between attacks based on national origin as opposed to attacks targeting a concept.
Option 2: exempt nationality (or certain specific subsets, such as “soldier subsets”) from criminal comparison attacks (or a subset of attacks).
We also welcome the Oversight Board’s guidance on wider questions surrounding our policies and enforcement that the case bundle raises.
We will implement the board’s decision once it has finished deliberating, and we will update this post accordingly. Please see the board’s website for the decision when they issue it.
