How we approach dangerous organizations and individuals.
How we support communities in the face of the opioid epidemic.
How we help prevent interference, empower people to vote and more.
How we work with independent fact-checkers, and more, to identify and take action on misinformation.
How we assess content for newsworthiness.
How we reduce problematic content in News Feed.
How we build AI systems.
Comprehensive access to public data from Facebook and Instagram
Comprehensive and searchable database of all ads currently running across Meta technologies
Additional tools for in-depth research on Meta technologies and programs
Quarterly report on how well we're doing at enforcing our policies on the Facebook app and Instagram.
Report on how well we're helping people protect their intellectual property.
Report on government request for people's data.
Report on when we restrict content that's reported to us as violating local law.
Report on intentional internet restrictions that limit people's ability to access the internet.
Quarterly report on what people see on Facebook, including the content that receives the widest distribution during the quarter.
Download current and past regulatory reports for Facebook and Instagram.
2024-046-FB-UA, 2024-047-IG-UA
Today, August 29, 2024, the Oversight Board announced that it has selected a case bundle from two user appeals about content posted to Facebook and Instagram. The first piece of content is a video showing a transgender woman being confronted for using the women's bathroom. The second piece of content is a video of a transgender girl winning a female sports competition in the United States, with some spectators vocally disapproving of the result.
Meta determined that neither video violated our policies on Hate Speech or Bullying and Harassment, as laid out in our Facebook Community Standards and Instagram Community Guidelines, and left both pieces of content up.
Under our Hate Speech policy, Meta removes any calls for exclusion of members of a protected characteristic group. We generally allow people to criticize concepts because we want to allow discussion about the ideas, institutions, and policies that are a central part of any society or cultural community.
In both cases, even if the content included a call for exclusion, we determined that the posts should nonetheless be allowed upon escalation in our content review process, given their newsworthiness. Transgender people’s access to bathrooms that correspond to their gender identity is the subject of considerable political debate in the United States.
While under our Bullying and Harassment policy Meta removes any attacks targeted at a private individual, in both instances we determined there is no explicit call for exclusion present in the posts.
We will implement the board’s decision once it has finished deliberating, and will update this post accordingly. Please see the Board's website for the decision when it issues it.