Meta

Meta
Policies
Community StandardsMeta Advertising StandardsOther policiesHow Meta improvesAge-Appropriate Content

Features
Our approach to dangerous organizations and individualsOur approach to the opioid epidemicOur approach to electionsOur approach to misinformationOur approach to newsworthy contentOur approach to Facebook Feed rankingOur approach to explaining rankingAccessibility at Meta

Research tools
Content Library and Content Library APIAd Library ToolsOther research tools and data catalogue

Enforcement
Detecting violationsTaking action

Governance
Governance innovationOversight Board overviewHow to appeal to the Oversight BoardOversight Board casesOversight Board recommendationsCreating the Oversight BoardOversight Board: Further asked questionsMeta’s Bi-Annual Updates on the Oversight BoardTracking the Oversight Board's Impact

Security
Threat disruptionsSecurity threatsThreat reporting

Reports
Community Standards Enforcement ReportIntellectual PropertyGovernment Requests for User DataContent Restrictions Based on Local LawInternet DisruptionsWidely Viewed Content ReportRegulatory and Other Transparency Reports

Policies
Community Standards
Meta Advertising Standards
Other policies
How Meta improves
Age-Appropriate Content
Features
Our approach to dangerous organizations and individuals
Our approach to the opioid epidemic
Our approach to elections
Our approach to misinformation
Our approach to newsworthy content
Our approach to Facebook Feed ranking
Our approach to explaining ranking
Accessibility at Meta
Research tools
Content Library and Content Library API
Ad Library Tools
Other research tools and data catalogue
Enforcement
Detecting violations
Taking action
Governance
Governance innovation
Oversight Board overview
How to appeal to the Oversight Board
Oversight Board cases
Oversight Board recommendations
Creating the Oversight Board
Oversight Board: Further asked questions
Meta’s Bi-Annual Updates on the Oversight Board
Tracking the Oversight Board's Impact
Security
Threat disruptions
Security threats
Threat reporting
Reports
Community Standards Enforcement Report
Intellectual Property
Government Requests for User Data
Content Restrictions Based on Local Law
Internet Disruptions
Widely Viewed Content Report
Regulatory and Other Transparency Reports
Policies
Community Standards
Meta Advertising Standards
Other policies
How Meta improves
Age-Appropriate Content
Features
Our approach to dangerous organizations and individuals
Our approach to the opioid epidemic
Our approach to elections
Our approach to misinformation
Our approach to newsworthy content
Our approach to Facebook Feed ranking
Our approach to explaining ranking
Accessibility at Meta
Research tools
Content Library and Content Library API
Ad Library Tools
Other research tools and data catalogue
Security
Threat disruptions
Security threats
Threat reporting
Reports
Community Standards Enforcement Report
Intellectual Property
Government Requests for User Data
Content Restrictions Based on Local Law
Internet Disruptions
Widely Viewed Content Report
Regulatory and Other Transparency Reports
Enforcement
Detecting violations
Taking action
Governance
Governance innovation
Oversight Board overview
How to appeal to the Oversight Board
Oversight Board cases
Oversight Board recommendations
Creating the Oversight Board
Oversight Board: Further asked questions
Meta’s Bi-Annual Updates on the Oversight Board
Tracking the Oversight Board's Impact
Policies
Community Standards
Meta Advertising Standards
Other policies
How Meta improves
Age-Appropriate Content
Features
Our approach to dangerous organizations and individuals
Our approach to the opioid epidemic
Our approach to elections
Our approach to misinformation
Our approach to newsworthy content
Our approach to Facebook Feed ranking
Our approach to explaining ranking
Accessibility at Meta
Research tools
Content Library and Content Library API
Ad Library Tools
Other research tools and data catalogue
Enforcement
Detecting violations
Taking action
Governance
Governance innovation
Oversight Board overview
How to appeal to the Oversight Board
Oversight Board cases
Oversight Board recommendations
Creating the Oversight Board
Oversight Board: Further asked questions
Meta’s Bi-Annual Updates on the Oversight Board
Tracking the Oversight Board's Impact
Security
Threat disruptions
Security threats
Threat reporting
Reports
Community Standards Enforcement Report
Intellectual Property
Government Requests for User Data
Content Restrictions Based on Local Law
Internet Disruptions
Widely Viewed Content Report
Regulatory and Other Transparency Reports
English (US)
Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookies
Home
Oversight
Creation of the Oversight Board

Creating the Oversight Board

UPDATED NOV 12, 2024
Every day, teams at Meta make difficult decisions about what content should stay up and what should come down based on the Community Standards. But given the size of our community and the reach of our platform, we created the Oversight Board to bring accountability to those decisions.

Why the board was created
In 2018, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg shared a blueprint outlining new and better ways for platforms like Facebook to remain accountable and bringing legitimacy to the rules that govern large communities on the internet.
With the input of scholars and experts, Meta put this note into action and devised an oversight board to provide an independent check on some of the most significant and difficult content decisions we make. The guiding idea behind the board was simple: Meta should not make so many important decisions about free expression and safety on our own.
Next, we underwent a global consultation process to better understand how to turn this vision into an institution. This consultation included input from experts all around the world, such as academics, technical experts, lawyers, designers and technologists, as well as input from members of the public. With this feedback, we were able to build the structures and documents that would serve as the foundation of governance for such a board. This included drafting a charter, establishing an independent trust and developing the board’s bylaws.

The board begins operations
In May 2020, the Oversight Board’s first 20 members were announced—an esteemed and thoughtful group who’ve worked in a variety of positions, including as professors, journalists and heads of state.
Following this announcement, members underwent training on our Community Standards, policy development processes, enforcement frameworks and the types of content decisions in scope for the board. Members also had a rigorous orientation around a new case management tool developed by Meta. This tool allows members to securely access and review pertinent case information from anywhere in the world.
The board began hearing cases in October 2020. Since then, it has issued a number of decisions and recommendations, which have already changed the way we moderate content for the billions of people on Facebook and Instagram.
Our goal has always been for the board to exist for years to come as an important piece of our broader strategy for content moderation. We’re committed to supporting the board as it develops as an institution and expands to 40 members. This includes continually examining the board’s scope and working to bring additional types of content outlined in the bylaws into that scope, a process we’ve already begun.
We hope the board can serve as a model for the future of content governance across our industry, as it continues to provide invaluable input into how we make some of the most consequential decisions regarding freedom of expression across the globe.
Meta
Transparency Center
Policies
Enforcement
Security
Features
Governance
Research tools
Reports
English (US)