Meta
Home
Enforcement
Taking Action
Reducing Distribution Of Problematic Content

Reducing the distribution of problematic content

UPDATED APR 25, 2025
If content on Facebook or Instagram doesn't violate the Community Standards, but might still be problematic or otherwise low-quality, Meta may reduce its distribution, consistent with user controls. This is one element of our broader "remove, reduce, inform" strategy that we've used since 2016.

Categories of problematic content we reduce
Our goals for reducing problematic content are based on the needs of our community. This work is focused on various types of problematic content in Feed, including reducing problematic comments on public posts from Pages and people. Here’s how we approach this process, along with some categories of problematic content we reduce.

Responding to people’s direct feedback
We often ask people about their experiences on Facebook, and we use surveys to better inform what we build. We consider people’s responses, as well as signals such as what they like, dislike, comment on or share. Based on this feedback, here are some types of problematic content we address:
  • Low-quality content, such as clickbait and engagement bait.
  • Links to websites that are covered with ads, slow to load or broken.
  • Low-quality comments that are repeatedly copied and pasted.

Incentivizing publishers to invest in high-quality content
We want people to have interesting, new material to engage with, so we work to set incentives that encourage the creation of high-quality content. And we disincentivize, for example:
  • Limited originality content that is principally repurposed from other sources.
  • Low-quality videos that abuse video or live video formats.
  • Misinformation.

Fostering a safer community
There is some content that individual people may want to see, but that others may find problematic, so we make it harder to encounter. This includes:
  • Content by creators that repeatedly violate our policies.

Our standards for recommending content
To help people discover new content and communities, we make personalized recommendations for people on Facebook and Instagram. Our Recommendations Guidelines serve as our baseline standards for the types of content we recommend.
Facebook
Instagram
Facebook may recommend content, accounts and entities—such as Pages, Groups or Events—that people don’t already follow. This includes:
  • Pages You May Like.
  • Groups You Should Join.
  • “Suggested For You” posts.
  • People You May Know.
Our Recommendations Guidelines are another important tool for managing problematic content on Facebook and Instagram. Because recommended content doesn’t come from accounts or entities people choose to follow, we work to avoid making recommendations that may be low-quality, objectionable, sensitive or inappropriate for younger viewers.

Meta
Policies
Community StandardsMeta Advertising StandardsOther policiesHow Meta improvesAge-Appropriate Content

Features
Our approach to dangerous organizations and individualsOur approach to the opioid epidemicOur approach to electionsOur approach to misinformationOur approach to newsworthy contentOur approach to Facebook Feed rankingOur approach to explaining rankingAccessibility at Meta

Research tools
Content Library and Content Library APIAd Library ToolsOther research tools and data catalogue

Enforcement
Detecting violationsTaking action

Governance
Governance innovationOversight Board overviewHow to appeal to the Oversight BoardOversight Board casesOversight Board recommendationsCreating the Oversight BoardOversight Board: Further asked questionsMeta’s Bi-Annual Updates on the Oversight BoardTracking the Oversight Board's Impact

Security
Threat disruptionsSecurity threatsThreat reporting

Reports
Community Standards Enforcement ReportIntellectual PropertyGovernment Requests for User DataContent Restrictions Based on Local LawInternet DisruptionsWidely Viewed Content ReportRegulatory and Other Transparency Reports

Policies
Community Standards
Meta Advertising Standards
Other policies
How Meta improves
Age-Appropriate Content
Features
Our approach to dangerous organizations and individuals
Our approach to the opioid epidemic
Our approach to elections
Our approach to misinformation
Our approach to newsworthy content
Our approach to Facebook Feed ranking
Our approach to explaining ranking
Accessibility at Meta
Research tools
Content Library and Content Library API
Ad Library Tools
Other research tools and data catalogue
Enforcement
Detecting violations
Taking action
Governance
Governance innovation
Oversight Board overview
How to appeal to the Oversight Board
Oversight Board cases
Oversight Board recommendations
Creating the Oversight Board
Oversight Board: Further asked questions
Meta’s Bi-Annual Updates on the Oversight Board
Tracking the Oversight Board's Impact
Security
Threat disruptions
Security threats
Threat reporting
Reports
Community Standards Enforcement Report
Intellectual Property
Government Requests for User Data
Content Restrictions Based on Local Law
Internet Disruptions
Widely Viewed Content Report
Regulatory and Other Transparency Reports
Policies
Community Standards
Meta Advertising Standards
Other policies
How Meta improves
Age-Appropriate Content
Features
Our approach to dangerous organizations and individuals
Our approach to the opioid epidemic
Our approach to elections
Our approach to misinformation
Our approach to newsworthy content
Our approach to Facebook Feed ranking
Our approach to explaining ranking
Accessibility at Meta
Research tools
Content Library and Content Library API
Ad Library Tools
Other research tools and data catalogue
Security
Threat disruptions
Security threats
Threat reporting
Reports
Community Standards Enforcement Report
Intellectual Property
Government Requests for User Data
Content Restrictions Based on Local Law
Internet Disruptions
Widely Viewed Content Report
Regulatory and Other Transparency Reports
Enforcement
Detecting violations
Taking action
Governance
Governance innovation
Oversight Board overview
How to appeal to the Oversight Board
Oversight Board cases
Oversight Board recommendations
Creating the Oversight Board
Oversight Board: Further asked questions
Meta’s Bi-Annual Updates on the Oversight Board
Tracking the Oversight Board's Impact
Policies
Community Standards
Meta Advertising Standards
Other policies
How Meta improves
Age-Appropriate Content
Features
Our approach to dangerous organizations and individuals
Our approach to the opioid epidemic
Our approach to elections
Our approach to misinformation
Our approach to newsworthy content
Our approach to Facebook Feed ranking
Our approach to explaining ranking
Accessibility at Meta
Research tools
Content Library and Content Library API
Ad Library Tools
Other research tools and data catalogue
Enforcement
Detecting violations
Taking action
Governance
Governance innovation
Oversight Board overview
How to appeal to the Oversight Board
Oversight Board cases
Oversight Board recommendations
Creating the Oversight Board
Oversight Board: Further asked questions
Meta’s Bi-Annual Updates on the Oversight Board
Tracking the Oversight Board's Impact
Security
Threat disruptions
Security threats
Threat reporting
Reports
Community Standards Enforcement Report
Intellectual Property
Government Requests for User Data
Content Restrictions Based on Local Law
Internet Disruptions
Widely Viewed Content Report
Regulatory and Other Transparency Reports
English (US)
Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookies
Meta
Transparency Center
Policies
Enforcement
Security
Features
Governance
Research tools
Reports
English (US)