Meta

Meta
Policies
Community StandardsMeta Advertising StandardsOther policiesHow Meta improvesAge-Appropriate Content

Features
Our approach to dangerous organizations and individualsOur approach to the opioid epidemicOur approach to electionsOur approach to misinformationOur approach to newsworthy contentOur approach to Facebook Feed rankingOur approach to explaining rankingAccessibility at Meta

Research tools
Content Library and Content Library APIAd Library ToolsOther research tools and data catalogue

Enforcement
Detecting violationsTaking action

Governance
Governance innovationOversight Board overviewHow to appeal to the Oversight BoardOversight Board casesOversight Board recommendationsCreating the Oversight BoardOversight Board: Further asked questionsMeta’s Bi-Annual Updates on the Oversight BoardTracking the Oversight Board's Impact

Security
Threat disruptionsSecurity threatsThreat reporting

Reports
Community Standards Enforcement ReportIntellectual PropertyGovernment Requests for User DataContent Restrictions Based on Local LawInternet DisruptionsWidely Viewed Content ReportRegulatory and Other Transparency Reports

Policies
Community Standards
Meta Advertising Standards
Other policies
How Meta improves
Age-Appropriate Content
Features
Our approach to dangerous organizations and individuals
Our approach to the opioid epidemic
Our approach to elections
Our approach to misinformation
Our approach to newsworthy content
Our approach to Facebook Feed ranking
Our approach to explaining ranking
Accessibility at Meta
Research tools
Content Library and Content Library API
Ad Library Tools
Other research tools and data catalogue
Enforcement
Detecting violations
Taking action
Governance
Governance innovation
Oversight Board overview
How to appeal to the Oversight Board
Oversight Board cases
Oversight Board recommendations
Creating the Oversight Board
Oversight Board: Further asked questions
Meta’s Bi-Annual Updates on the Oversight Board
Tracking the Oversight Board's Impact
Security
Threat disruptions
Security threats
Threat reporting
Reports
Community Standards Enforcement Report
Intellectual Property
Government Requests for User Data
Content Restrictions Based on Local Law
Internet Disruptions
Widely Viewed Content Report
Regulatory and Other Transparency Reports
Policies
Community Standards
Meta Advertising Standards
Other policies
How Meta improves
Age-Appropriate Content
Features
Our approach to dangerous organizations and individuals
Our approach to the opioid epidemic
Our approach to elections
Our approach to misinformation
Our approach to newsworthy content
Our approach to Facebook Feed ranking
Our approach to explaining ranking
Accessibility at Meta
Research tools
Content Library and Content Library API
Ad Library Tools
Other research tools and data catalogue
Security
Threat disruptions
Security threats
Threat reporting
Reports
Community Standards Enforcement Report
Intellectual Property
Government Requests for User Data
Content Restrictions Based on Local Law
Internet Disruptions
Widely Viewed Content Report
Regulatory and Other Transparency Reports
Enforcement
Detecting violations
Taking action
Governance
Governance innovation
Oversight Board overview
How to appeal to the Oversight Board
Oversight Board cases
Oversight Board recommendations
Creating the Oversight Board
Oversight Board: Further asked questions
Meta’s Bi-Annual Updates on the Oversight Board
Tracking the Oversight Board's Impact
Policies
Community Standards
Meta Advertising Standards
Other policies
How Meta improves
Age-Appropriate Content
Features
Our approach to dangerous organizations and individuals
Our approach to the opioid epidemic
Our approach to elections
Our approach to misinformation
Our approach to newsworthy content
Our approach to Facebook Feed ranking
Our approach to explaining ranking
Accessibility at Meta
Research tools
Content Library and Content Library API
Ad Library Tools
Other research tools and data catalogue
Enforcement
Detecting violations
Taking action
Governance
Governance innovation
Oversight Board overview
How to appeal to the Oversight Board
Oversight Board cases
Oversight Board recommendations
Creating the Oversight Board
Oversight Board: Further asked questions
Meta’s Bi-Annual Updates on the Oversight Board
Tracking the Oversight Board's Impact
Security
Threat disruptions
Security threats
Threat reporting
Reports
Community Standards Enforcement Report
Intellectual Property
Government Requests for User Data
Content Restrictions Based on Local Law
Internet Disruptions
Widely Viewed Content Report
Regulatory and Other Transparency Reports
English (US)
Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookies
Home
Reports
Integrity Reports Q3 2024

Integrity Reports, Third Quarter 2024

UPDATED FEB 27, 2025
We’re publishing our third quarter reports for 2024, including the Community Standards Enforcement Report, Adversarial Threat Report, Widely Viewed Content Report and the biannual Transparency Report consisting of Government Requests for User Data and Content Restrictions Based on Local Law. All of the reports are available in our Transparency Center. Some report highlights include:
Community Standards Enforcement Report
Prevalence remained consistent across a range of violation types. We are also expanding the scope of the report to include Spam metrics on Instagram for the first time. The report now covers 14 policy areas on Facebook and 13 on Instagram.
Adversarial Threat Report
In our Q3 Adversarial Threat report, we’re sharing threat research into five new covert influence operations that we took down in Moldova, India, Iran and Lebanon. We detected and removed these campaigns before they were able to build authentic audiences on our apps. We also include an update on Doppelganger, the most persistent Russian influence operation we’ve disrupted since 2017. Finally, as we look back to 2024 with its many elections around the world, we’re sharing some key insights into the global threat landscape. You can read the full report here.
Widely Viewed Content Report
In Q3, we updated the title of “Page Follower” to “Public Follower” to reflect an internal change of how we track public following. This change didn’t impact how users viewed content. You can read the full report here.
Government Requests for User Data
During the first half of 2024, global government requests for user data increased 7.4% from 271,692 to 323,846. India is the top requester, with a 7.7% increase in requests, followed by the United States, Brazil and Germany.
In the US, we’ve received 81,884 requests– an increase of 11.6% – from the first half of 2024, which includes non-disclosure orders prohibiting Meta from notifying the user 76.6% of the time. Emergency requests accounted for 5.2% of the total request in the US, slightly declining from the second half of 2023.
Additionally, as a result of transparency updates introduced in the 2016 USA Freedom Act, the US government lifted non-disclosure orders on 14 National Security Letters. These requests, along with the US government’s authorization letters, are available here.
We continue to support the NDO Fairness Act, which is now under consideration in the U.S. Senate, which will improve our users’ ability to receive notice when their data is the subject of a legal demand.
Content Restrictions Based on Local Law
For many years, we’ve published biannual transparency reports, which include the volume of content restrictions we make when content is reported as violating local law but doesn’t go against our Community Standards. This report includes information where in limited countries we are obligated to automatically restrict content, at scale and in country, based on local law requirements, which is reflected in the comparatively higher volumes of content restrictions.
During this reporting period, the volume of content restrictions based on local law for Facebook and Instagram increased globally from 48 million in H2 2023 to over 149 million in the H1 2024, driven by obligations in Indonesia where over 148 million items were restricted under the Electronic Information and Transactions (EIT) Law and KOMINFO Regulation 5/2020 on Private Electronic Services Operator for gambling content.
We continually review our processes and protocols to help ensure the accuracy of our reporting. You can read more here.
NCMEC CyberTips
As part of our ongoing work to provide young people with safe, positive online experiences, we're continuing to provide more transparency into our efforts to find and report child exploitation to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC). We began sharing this data last year.
In Q3 2024, we reported the following number of CyberTips to NCMEC from Facebook and Instagram:
  • Facebook and Instagram sent over 1.6 million NCMEC CyberTip reports for child sexual exploitation.
    • Of these reports, over 120 thousand involved inappropriate interactions with children. CyberTips relating to inappropriate interactions with children may include an adult soliciting child sexual abuse material (CSAM) directly from a minor or attempting to meet and cause harm to a child in person. These CyberTips also include cases where a child is in apparent imminent danger.
    • Over 1.5 million reports related to shared or re-shared photos and videos that contain CSAM.
Meta
Transparency Center
Policies
Enforcement
Security
Features
Governance
Research tools
Reports
English (US)