Policies that outline what is and isn't allowed on our apps.
Policies for ad content and business assets.
Other policies that apply to Meta technologies.
How we update our policies, measure results, work with others, and more.
Explore how we help teens have safe, positive experiences on Facebook and Instagram.
How we approach dangerous organizations and individuals.
How we support communities in the face of the opioid epidemic.
How we help prevent interference, empower people to vote and more.
How we work with independent fact-checkers, and more, to identify and take action on misinformation.
How we assess content for newsworthiness.
How we reduce problematic content in News Feed.
How we build AI systems.
Comprehensive access to public data from Facebook and Instagram
Comprehensive and searchable database of all ads currently running across Meta technologies
Additional tools for in-depth research on Meta technologies and programs
Quarterly report on how well we're doing at enforcing our policies on the Facebook app and Instagram.
Report on how well we're helping people protect their intellectual property.
Report on government request for people's data.
Report on when we restrict content that's reported to us as violating local law.
Report on intentional internet restrictions that limit people's ability to access the internet.
Quarterly report on what people see on Facebook, including the content that receives the widest distribution during the quarter.
Download current and past regulatory reports for Facebook and Instagram.
2025-005-IG-UA, 2025-006-IG-UA, 2025-007-IG-MR, 2025-008-FB-MR
Today, January 9, 2025, the Oversight Board selected a case bundle regarding four posts which include images and videos posted to Instagram and Facebook depicting indigenous women with their breasts uncovered in non-sexual contexts.
Two cases were appealed to the Board by Instagram users. The first case concerns an image posted to Instagram featuring two bare-breasted women in the traditional attire of the Himba people of Namibia, with a caption that references the Himba. The second case concerns a short video posted to Instagram that shows a Himba man dancing bare-chested, with bare-breasted women in traditional attire in the background. The caption contains English, French and Arabic words as well as Himba, dance, culture and travel hashtags.
The content in the first and second cases were removed by Meta for violating our Adult Nudity and Sexual Activity policy, as laid out in the Facebook Community Standards and Instagram Community Guidelines. Under our Adult Nudity and Sexual Activity policy, Meta prohibits: “Imagery, and digital imagery, of adult nudity” in a variety of contexts, including, “uncovered female nipples, except in a breastfeeding, mastectomy, medical, health, or act of protest context.” Meta determined these two pieces of content did not qualify for a newsworthiness allowance.
The remaining cases were referred to the Board by Meta. The third case deals with an image posted to Instagram by the official account of a political party in Brazil. The image includes indigenous women in traditional Yanomami clothing with their breasts uncovered. Portuguese text on the image praises government efforts to reduce fires and combat illegal mining on Yanomami indigenous lands. The caption, also in Portuguese, emphasizes the importance of the government protecting indigenous land rights.
The fourth case deals with an image posted to Facebook by a German newspaper. The image shows a bare-breasted indigenous woman holding a child. The caption, written in German, describes a visit by a U.S. journalist to a Mayan village in Mexico and her perspective as a mother on local parenting, also providing a link to an article. The indigenous woman in the image does not appear to be Mayan. The image seems to belong to a photo agency, appearing in online collections of an indigenous Ethiopian group.
Meta determined that the content in both of these cases violated our Adult Nudity and Sexual Activity policy, but decided that the content should be left up for the following reasons:
For the third case, Meta applied the newsworthy allowance, because while the content is violating, Meta noted the post was from a political party discussing political issues and that the public interest value outweighed the risk of harm.
For the fourth case, Meta applied the spirit of the policy allowance because as the user is a news outlet, Meta believed the image of the indigenous woman was taken with consent and on the understanding it would be distributed.
Meta referred these two cases to the Board because we found them significant and difficult, as they create tension between our values of voice, privacy and dignity.
We will implement the Board’s decision once it has finished deliberating, and will update this post accordingly. Please see the Board’s website for the decision when they issue it.