Meta

Meta
Policies
Community StandardsMeta Advertising StandardsOther policiesHow Meta improvesAge-appropriate content

Features
Our approach to dangerous organisations and individualsOur approach to the opioid epidemicOur approach to electionsOur approach to misinformationOur approach to newsworthy contentOur approach to Facebook Feed rankingOur approach to explaining rankingAccessibility at Meta

Research tools
Content Library and Content Library APIAd Library toolsOther research tools and data catalogue

Enforcement
Detecting violationsTaking action

Governance
Governance innovationOversight Board overviewHow to appeal to the Oversight BoardOversight Board casesOversight Board recommendationsCreating the Oversight BoardOversight Board: Further asked questionsMeta's biannual updates on the Oversight BoardTracking the Oversight Board's impact

Security
Threat disruptionsSecurity threatsThreat reporting

Reports
Community Standards enforcement reportIntellectual propertyGovernment requests for user dataContent restrictions based on local lawInternet disruptionsWidely viewed content reportRegulatory and other transparency reports

Policies
Community Standards
Meta Advertising Standards
Other policies
How Meta improves
Age-appropriate content
Features
Our approach to dangerous organisations and individuals
Our approach to the opioid epidemic
Our approach to elections
Our approach to misinformation
Our approach to newsworthy content
Our approach to Facebook Feed ranking
Our approach to explaining ranking
Accessibility at Meta
Research tools
Content Library and Content Library API
Ad Library tools
Other research tools and data catalogue
Enforcement
Detecting violations
Taking action
Governance
Governance innovation
Oversight Board overview
How to appeal to the Oversight Board
Oversight Board cases
Oversight Board recommendations
Creating the Oversight Board
Oversight Board: Further asked questions
Meta's biannual updates on the Oversight Board
Tracking the Oversight Board's impact
Security
Threat disruptions
Security threats
Threat reporting
Reports
Community Standards enforcement report
Intellectual property
Government requests for user data
Content restrictions based on local law
Internet disruptions
Widely viewed content report
Regulatory and other transparency reports
Policies
Community Standards
Meta Advertising Standards
Other policies
How Meta improves
Age-appropriate content
Features
Our approach to dangerous organisations and individuals
Our approach to the opioid epidemic
Our approach to elections
Our approach to misinformation
Our approach to newsworthy content
Our approach to Facebook Feed ranking
Our approach to explaining ranking
Accessibility at Meta
Research tools
Content Library and Content Library API
Ad Library tools
Other research tools and data catalogue
Security
Threat disruptions
Security threats
Threat reporting
Reports
Community Standards enforcement report
Intellectual property
Government requests for user data
Content restrictions based on local law
Internet disruptions
Widely viewed content report
Regulatory and other transparency reports
Enforcement
Detecting violations
Taking action
Governance
Governance innovation
Oversight Board overview
How to appeal to the Oversight Board
Oversight Board cases
Oversight Board recommendations
Creating the Oversight Board
Oversight Board: Further asked questions
Meta's biannual updates on the Oversight Board
Tracking the Oversight Board's impact
Policies
Community Standards
Meta Advertising Standards
Other policies
How Meta improves
Age-appropriate content
Features
Our approach to dangerous organisations and individuals
Our approach to the opioid epidemic
Our approach to elections
Our approach to misinformation
Our approach to newsworthy content
Our approach to Facebook Feed ranking
Our approach to explaining ranking
Accessibility at Meta
Research tools
Content Library and Content Library API
Ad Library tools
Other research tools and data catalogue
Enforcement
Detecting violations
Taking action
Governance
Governance innovation
Oversight Board overview
How to appeal to the Oversight Board
Oversight Board cases
Oversight Board recommendations
Creating the Oversight Board
Oversight Board: Further asked questions
Meta's biannual updates on the Oversight Board
Tracking the Oversight Board's impact
Security
Threat disruptions
Security threats
Threat reporting
Reports
Community Standards enforcement report
Intellectual property
Government requests for user data
Content restrictions based on local law
Internet disruptions
Widely viewed content report
Regulatory and other transparency reports
English (UK)
Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookies
Home
Policies
How Meta improves
Building inclusive stakeholder base

Building an inclusive stakeholder base

UPDATED 12 NOV 2024
Inclusivity is at the heart of Meta's mission to give people the power to build community and bring the world closer together. For this mission to be realised, our policies need to represent the variety of perspectives shared by our global community.
Inclusivity is one of Facebook's core principles for stakeholder engagement. We recognise the fundamental value of embedding an inclusive approach in our work. Inclusivity in our policy-making helps us balance our policies between the priorities of safety and voice for everyone. One of the crucial ways that we do this is by identifying groups that may be on the margins of society and bringing them into the centre of our policy-making process through focused effort. We understand that this process also helps us build trust with our broad and diverse community and ensures that our policies are more representative of the communities who use our platforms.
Inclusivity for Meta is a systematic process that we have embedded into our stakeholder engagement work. This process means the conscious and consistent integration of the following three inclusivity values across our policy development efforts.
EQUITY
We recognise that there is an unequal distribution of power between Meta and external stakeholders. We work to ensure that all identified stakeholders are invited to contribute to the development of our Community Standards.
We are particularly sensitive to vulnerable communities using our platforms, which is why our Stakeholder Engagement team seeks to bring their voices into the heart of our policy-making process.
DIVERSITY
We proactively identify a diverse range of potentially affected stakeholders for our engagements, both in terms of background and opinion. We continually seek to broaden the spectrum of the stakeholders with whom we engage.
Identifying who we should engage with is often a challenge – particularly in the case of emerging policy issues. This is why we continuously work with internal teams, experts and existing partners to identify new stakeholders to help us evolve in tandem with the issues facing global communities.
ACCESSIBILITY
We recognise that each of our stakeholders has different needs. These needs may be technical (e.g. access to high-speed Internet), linguistic (e.g. ability to carry out engagements in second or third languages), and knowledge-based (e.g. detailed understanding of the Community Standards). We build flexible strategies to address these needs in our engagement and meet stakeholders where they are, ensuring that they can participate meaningfully.
Meta
Transparency Centre
Policies
Enforcement
Security
Features
Governance
Research tools
Reports
English (UK)