To provide greater clarity to users, Meta should clarify the scope of the policy exception under the Dangerous Organizations and Individuals Community Standard, which allows for content “reporting on, neutrally discussing or condemning dangerous organizations and individuals or their activities” to be shared in the context of “social and political discourse.” Specifically, Meta should clarify how this policy exception relates to election-related content.
The Board will consider this implemented when Meta makes this clarification change in its Community Standard.
The Board will consider this implemented when Meta makes this clarification change in its Community Standard.
Our commitment: We will update our Dangerous Organizations and Individuals Community Standards to clarify our updated approach to content related to social and political discourse including examples. We will clarify in our external policy that this updated approach includes allowing discussion related to elections when the content is otherwise non-violating.
Considerations: In December 2023 we introduced a number of updates to our Dangerous Organizations and Individuals Policy internally and in our Community Standards as a result of ongoing policy development. As part of policy development, we updated definitions for “Glorification,” “Support,” and “Representation.” This update also included adopting an allowance for social and political discourse of DOIs, as we recognized that our former policy approach may have captured some content that did not actually praise, represent, or materially support a DOI. We implemented this allowance for social and political discourse in certain instances such as elections, peace agreements, human rights-related issues, news reporting and academic, neutral and condemning discussion along with enforcement changes to ensure users are not unduly penalized for sharing content that is discussing a DOI but not intended to glorify, represent, or materially support an entity in an election, for example.
As we noted in
our announcement about these changes, this allowance was prompted by discussion with and feedback from internal and external stakeholders. While we have made this update internally, we will share further details about our social and political discourse allowance, including examples related to elections, in the Community Standards.
In response to this recommendation, we will introduce these updates to our Dangerous Organizations and Individuals Policy to our Community Standards to more clearly share instances where our policy allows elections-related discussion.